The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. how widespread is the problem? what problem will this shortage of time causes?
Recently, the phenomenon of the time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although the contested by many that the matter of complex procedure is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that <span style="font-size: 17.6px; white-space: normal;">the time people devote in job</span> can be a plus, and I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, <span style="font-size: 17.6px; white-space: normal;">the time people devote in job</span> can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the vocational education. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, <span style="font-size: 17.6px; white-space: normal;">the time people devote in job</span> might increase the consequence of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of practical learning could relate to this reality that the demerits of laboratory experiments pertain to intellectual development. As a tangible example, some scientific research conducted by the prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, It is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of <span style="font-size: 17.6px; white-space: normal;">the time people devote in job</span> far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-12 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-05-26 | ptehelp79 | 77 | view |
| 2018-04-28 | ptehelp79 | 77 | view |
- If you are assigned to work on a study on climate change, what will you choose to focus on and why? 85
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 11
- e Does a certain type of music affect young children's learning? Agree / Disagree 88
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- If you are assigned to work on a study on climate change, what will you choose to focus on and why? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1207.87684729 154% => OK
No of words: 303.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15511551155 5.00649968141 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.90774685265 2.71678728327 144% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597359735974 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 379.143842365 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5039413015 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.416666667 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222854036972 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872833470148 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119344502561 0.071462118173 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155615268817 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960778482326 0.0609392437508 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 12.6369458128 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.74 11.5310837438 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.