The influence of violence on TV or in the movies, which is always debatable, has now become more controversial. It is argued that watching violence video can lead people to commit crime, on the other hand, some people claim that watching violence movies does affect adversely as well. This article will elaborate the impact of violence videos and thus lead to a constructive conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why violence movies result in violence crime, and the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that people are prone to imitate others' actions. For instance, a famous video online shows that strangers in a subway can easily laugh when they see others' smile, which is especially true for children. Therefore, simulation is considered as a crucial reason to the connection between crime and violence movies.
Nevertheless, whose who argue that violence movies should not be blamed have a different point of view. The most alarming one is rooted in the fact that lots of people cherish the peace more after they realize the horrible consequence of violence from videos. As an illustration, war movies make us understand what our ancestors paid for the cruel violence. Furthermore, people who watch violence movies are possible to commit crime even if they don't watch at all, which represents a confusion of the results and reasons.
Considering all the substantial insights which are outlined above, we can safely reach a conclusion that the positive correlation between crime rates and watching violence movies lacks evidence, which is due to the different reactions from various people.
- Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree. 77
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 77
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 55
- Some people think the purpose of education is to prepare the future workforce and make good members of society. Others think the purpose of education should lead to self-fulfillment. What is your opinion? 85
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e possible to commit crime even if they dont watch at all, which represents a confus...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 5.94088669951 269% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17557251908 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70882678586 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599236641221 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9234001102 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.272727273 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276821866987 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108986660438 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625964860246 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169671205712 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861560144703 0.0609392437508 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.