What is the advantages and disadvantages of climate change?
Recently, the phenomenon of environment pollution has sparked an ongoing controversy,
which inevitably leads to a moot question “is this alarming issue should be managed by
individuals?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that the real change can be made at the
government level, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the individual standpoint, environment pollution is bound up inextricably with
individual’s waste, which indicates they lead to both greenhouse gases and carbon
footprint. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in
2014 demonstrates the relationship between Enthusiasm and communal cooperation as well
as an exponential increase in social conduct. Their academic criticism was impressive.
Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to raising public awareness, active role, littering, and
private cars alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the
contention that the likelihood of tackling this challenge is correlated positively with not only
individual’s involvement but also renewable resources.
Within the realm of governments, without the slightest doubt, environmental contamination
attribute to governmental policies, in that it would come down to the social endorsement,
informing individuals, and political power. A salient example of such attribution is instilling
discipline, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take encouraging people for
granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity
to pinpoint introducing law problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to
recycling energies, public transport, and even subsidies NGOs. Besides, this criterion is an
indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of
environmental regulations in preserving the environment.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what
elaborated above, I entirely agree that both individuals and governments are accountable
for environment pollution. Meanwhile, as a feasible solution, the local authorities are
recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their
intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-11 | shokoufeh | 84 | view |
| 2022-04-15 | پیام احدنژاد | 68 | view |
| 2021-10-23 | Alireza.r.m | 68 | view |
| 2021-10-18 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2021-03-12 | vahidmetall | 68 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...of that throughout this essay. From the sports medicine standpoint, adventurous sports...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 790, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Researchers
...heir academic criticism was impressive. researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to vigorous ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1981, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1207.87684729 154% => OK
No of words: 320.0 242.827586207 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.828125 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29907509529 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 139.433497537 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6875 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 379.143842365 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8068779046 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0117704381397 0.242375264174 5% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00283245447263 0.0925447433944 3% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0105980742002 0.071462118173 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0117704381397 0.151781067708 8% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 55.0591133005 223% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.