What do you think about our environment considering the fact that there has been steady increase in pollution and affects like global warming are increasing as time is passing by? Are we under jeopardy? Is the humanity safe?
In this current world, there is an ongoing deliberation among people on environmental pollution. While some people tell that human kind are in danger, but some some argue that the risk is negligible for the mankind. On my point of view, both man and all the living beings are in danger considering the current pollution rates. In this essay, I shall discuss on factors strengthening my argument while analyzing both the sides of the argument.
Firstly, we will see the kinds of pollution around us, those are air pollution, water pollution and deforestation respectively. Nowadays, majority of the air pollution is caused by vehicular pollution together with power generations by coal power. This may increase the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide concentration of the air creating a green house effect on the earth. Consequently, there is a risk of damaging the ozone layer. Apart from that, bad weather conditions will affect the agricultural production in an adverse manner while jepordizing the whole countries manufacturing cycle.
On the other hand, some people do not see a risk of pollution. Therefore they continue with emitting greenhouse gases to the environment and they deforest the forest area in the name of industrialization. However, this argument is not acceptable because we can see the live examples which jepordize human life with bad weather conditions.
In conclusion, governments should invest and promote sustainable growth because the money spent on disasters can be saved through this initiative. It is evident that, greenhouse effect has made the glaciers to melt creating threats to the small islands such as Maldives. Therefore, to survive the earth each individual has to extend their contribution towards recycling and reusing as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | vandana2715 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | bashob | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | bashob | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | bashob | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | hemsingh81 | 88 | view |
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. 77
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private lives 72
- Investing in Science 72
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts 77
- Some people say that parents should encourage their children to take part in organized group activities in their time. Others say that it is important for children to learn how to occupy themselves on their own.Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: some
...tell that human kind are in danger, but some some argue that the risk is negligible for t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an adverse manner" with adverb for "adverse"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...will affect the agricultural production in an adverse manner while jepordizing the whole countries m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... people do not see a risk of pollution. Therefore they continue with emitting greenhouse ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, apart from, as to, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01637537587 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621428571429 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6394861479 50.4703680194 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.8666666667 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.25397266985 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0901124516102 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261092428219 0.0925447433944 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253238997502 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0474421431965 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340665989108 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.