whether design building
The importance of whether design building which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. In my opinion, the former preposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate the positive effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this arguments but the most alarming one is that whether design buildings have very positive effect on the people's life it encourages the employees to work better and lend to hand a profits. Moreover, the proper air circulation and good design of the build is less chance of obtain the diseases. Needless to say all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate this argument but one can crucial effect is that some buildings has not build properly and they have fully covered and they have not space for air circulation and sunlight which lead to increase many healthy problems.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion the benefits of well design buildings are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawback should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d of reasons which will further explain this arguments but the most alarming one is ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ldings have very positive effect on the peoples life it encourages the employees to wor...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a profit' or simply 'profits'?
Suggestion: a profit; profits
...ployees to work better and lend to hand a profits. Moreover, the proper air circulation a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'builded', 'built'.
Suggestion: builded; built
...l effect is that some buildings has not build properly and they have fully covered an...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 31.9359605911 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 1207.87684729 87% => OK
No of words: 202.0 242.827586207 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20297029703 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69050638822 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618811881188 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 379.143842365 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.6551129109 50.4703680194 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.777777778 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315998612988 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116058995269 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112236038123 0.071462118173 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182174962987 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710040299019 0.0609392437508 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.