Whether designing of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of designing the building and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of working environment is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that negative outcomes can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the individual's life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of designing modern construction, as well as impressive buildings, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered modern architecture. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the positive influence and working conditions apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of people's satisfaction, the impact on citizen's life might increase the consequences of building industry. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the design process could relate to this reality that the demerits of architectural designer pertain to daily life. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of construction workers is correlated negatively with disadvantages outcomes. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a master builder.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of positive effects on the working life far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a traditional design prove the significance of the design process, but also pinpoint classical design implications.
- Having a diet or doing exercise, which one is better for a fit body? 85
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 77
- Whether designing of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 55
- Teenagers should be taught financial lessons at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ividuals. I am inclined to believe that individuals life can be a plus, and I will analyze ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 467, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...rom a general standpoint, the impact on citizens life can provide the society with some ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26597569223 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2221897054 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.636363636 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.12807881773 48% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176177616012 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555141439498 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647762966688 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10413743462 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077548878221 0.0609392437508 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.