Recently, the phenomenon of experimental learning has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question" Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education or not?". Whereas it is a widely held view that experimental learning is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
Form the educational standpoint, methods of experimental education are bound up inextricably with enhancing academic education, which indicates they lead to both practical learning and school-based education. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between student and teachers as well as an exponential increase in the rate of enrollment. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to distance-learning methods and experience-based methods alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of effective education system is correlated positively with not only experiment-oriented education but also academic concepts.
Within the realm of sociology, without the slightest doubt, the theoretical education attributes to modern methods of education, in that it would come down to in-use concepts and practical lessons. A salient example of such attribution is an apprenticeship period, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take class-based methods for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint pure academic learning problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to the recognition of prior learning and even self-study concepts. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the experimental pathway of education.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes" All's well that ends well, " after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly agree that the experimental education system is of the high importance.
- Advertisements influence people's behavior in a negative way. Do you agree or disagree with the statement. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 77
- Television is dangerous because of it destroys family life and any sense of community. Instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television. 88
- Television is dangerous because of it destroys family life and any sense of community. Instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television. 11
- All examinations in some countries take place at the end of the academic year, but others spread out throughout an academic year's. Pros & Cons 88
- Climate change? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 5.75862068966 365% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95862068966 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50271510113 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637931034483 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3030476559 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196499729302 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064831055537 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597250260383 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121111957589 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548047269414 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.94827586207 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.