Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of practical learning method and its corresponding impacts on students sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that such issue has some detrimental drawbacks in terms of theoretical aspects, proponents stand still and regarded this as thoroughly both rewarding and constructive. I profoundly inclined to believe that experiments should be considered by institute authorities and this essay will examine both sides of this concern by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
On the one hand, from an educational standpoint, some opponents argued that course syllabus and teaching curriculum should be based on theoretical method. Moreover, they tend to think that in experimental methods, assessments will not be accurate. According to an academic survey conducted by Tehran University, most of the students are tend to refuse practical learning due to the lack of educational systems which just prepared them by some theoretical courses such as mathematics and physics.
On the other hand, defenders of practical learning support their idea through some valid logic. Firstly, they prove the high-level accuracy of educational achievement which provided by this kind of education method for students. Secondly, supporters of practical courses are tending to believe that these courses can provide the opportunity for students to share their thoughts and ideas with their counterparts. Finally, due to an academic research conducted by MIT University, experimental learning could lead to improving teamwork ability in students which is a useful skill in their future life. Not to mention that it could lead to social interaction and increase the positive and interactive behavior in juveniles.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that it cannot be denied that experience is a major part of every person life. Although teaching could be useful during the life of everyone, the role of experience is of essential.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 80
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage What problems will it cause? 77
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 77
- Medical technology is responsible for a human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- It is foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...an University, most of the students are tend to refuse practical learning due to the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61073825503 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0340841141 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577181208054 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1929189353 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.615384615 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0588509854202 0.242375264174 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0222612442703 0.0925447433944 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258054125553 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0315062767279 0.151781067708 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240005350791 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.