Whether or not experiential learning can work well in formal education. Do you think experiential learning is beneficial in high schools and colleges?
Recently, the phenomenon of assessing the effectiveness of practical courses rather than theoretical ones and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate among the populations. Although this type of education is beneficial as it could regarded by the substantial numbers of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that it can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, there are several reasons why experimental lessons are advantagous. These benefits are rooted in the fact of modern education. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these merits. Firstly, pupils can get familiar with details of each evidence or phenomenon. They have this opportunity to observe everything in a closer way. Furthermore, due to the nature of these lessons as they are practical, this kind of curriculum is more interesting and have not the dull conditions. Hence, the youths are more likely to attend and study. Moreover, according to recent research undertaken by a prestigious university, experiential instructing has more efficiency and productivity. This survey showed pupils have better grades in these lessons in comparison of the theoretical ones.
On the one hand, there is no doubt, some other faculties believe that the theoretical lessons are more effective than the experimental ones. They asserted that students have not sufficient concentration in these classes. Also, they argue that the nature of some paramount lessons is not practical and pupils should learn them in a theoretical way including mathematics.
In conclusion, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly belive that the experimental instructing is more outweigh of the theoretical one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-24 | bashirheidari | 11 | view |
- Cities are now expanding the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership Agree or Disagree 11
- It is a foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down. Agree or not? 11
- Whether designing of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 85
- Life experience is a better teacher than school or foreign education. Give an example and support opinion. 88
- Climate change and about the roles that Government, Corporate, and Individuals can play to improve it. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'regard'
Suggestion: regard
... of education is beneficial as it could regarded by the substantial numbers of individua...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e brilliant aspects for its adherents. From a social standpoint, there are seve...
^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a theoretical way" with adverb for "theoretical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... practical and pupils should learn them in a theoretical way including mathematics. In conclusion...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55244755245 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19171595095 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597902097902 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5686147163 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0478366035303 0.242375264174 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0149873157512 0.0925447433944 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0229324288851 0.071462118173 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0256206157263 0.151781067708 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170473238486 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.