which is better experiential learning or traditional learning ? give your opinion.
Recently, the options of learning traditionally versus experiments have become a debatable topic in today's world. Some people assert that experimental learning is far better than traditional learning but opponents say there cannot be better learning than traditional. In this essay, I will elaborate views of both sides and my opinions as well.
To begin with, traditional learning has always been an important source of learning as people get to know how to deal with issues of day-to-day life by reading some traditional books or some literature. For instance, they can attain the solutions for problems of the people who have already faced such kind of situation in the past. In addition to this, by reading the experiences of others, they can get benefit from it and enhance their knowledge regarding that particular problem. Traditional learning has always been a vital source of learning which creates a redefined version of a person as they come to know so many things.
On the other hand, proponents of experimental learning emphasize on acquiring knowledge from experiments only that can prove to be beneficial in long run. A good illustration of this can be, whenever a person stuck in some unordinary situation, the lesson he/she learns remains for his/her whole life and can be useful for his/her entire life. Moreover, this can be an example for others too which is proved to be very useful for them. In my opinion, traditional learning can be profitable to some extent but experimental learning leaves an ever-lasting mark on someone’s life. A person can increase his horizon of learning through more experiments as compared to traditional learning as he/she can obtain theoretical knowledge from books or literature only.
To recapitulate, both traditional learning and learning through experiments have their own advantages. In some cases, people find very useful learning from traditional whereas others accept that person always learn through experiments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Ahmed Abuelmagd | 55 | view |
- Artificially intelligent robots are increasingly taking human jobs. Some people believe that eventually all work will be done by robots while others believe that there will be a limit to the tasks that robots can perform. Choose which position you most ag 77
- Happiness index is becoming a new national success rather than only economic growth What do you think about this idea What can be used to measure happiness index 85
- which is better experiential learning or traditional learning ? give your opinion. 77
- In developing countries, tourism has disadvantages or advantages? 70
- Whether experimental learning (learning by doing) can work well in formal education, Agree or Disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to emphasize'
Suggestion: to emphasize
...nd, proponents of experimental learning emphasize on acquiring knowledge from experiments...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, kind of, in my opinion, in some cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 314.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33121019108 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95348470961 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525477707006 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.989502799 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.25397266985 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349041510858 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148782357098 0.0925447433944 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108246487795 0.071462118173 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260730940606 0.151781067708 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681638490799 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.