The benefits and drawbacks of learning old theater literacy has always been a groundswell debate for high school education. Some people believe that these art forms are beneficial for preserving their traditional culture. Others doubt that learning these plays from long time ago would be inconsistent with modern narratives of arts, thus, being time-wasting for the students. The following essay would further elaborate both sides in detail with examples.
To begin with, the prime benefit of studying old narratives of art forms such as dramas and novels help the students be aware of unique traditions, customs, rituals, and lifestyle of people of bygone centuries. For example, there are tragedy from the great playwright Shakespeare, propelling the students back to the 16th century, to learn the contradiction of psychology and actions between people from different level of the society. This is not only helpful for the students to build a habit of critical thinking, but also prevent the past mistakes from reappearing by the students. Thus, the valuable, precious human heritage could be preserved while those outdated beliefs, customs or rituals which do more harm than good would be avoided.
On the flip side, the old narratives of art forms such as dramas and plays of the theater is contrast with the requirements of modern society. Students in high schools who are confronted with the future competition in either academic study or professional fields. For example, the modern job market requires a lot in operating modern technologies, teamwork and leadership. Youngsters paying too much attention towards those romantic or tragic forms of literature will be considered as detachment of the modern society, and thus, impede them from integrating into the work force.
To conclude, it is drawn that studying literature in school and college days is beneficial for personal growth, simultaneously, the bad impact of these literary pieces cannot be ignored. A balanced pedagogical approach is needed to adapt to take the benefits of classical writings.
- Government should look forward more to improving public transportation, instead of expanding the road network for vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 80
- Life experience is better than books or formal education? Agree or disagree? 92
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal learning, agree or disagree? 88
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past even if it will be expensive to do so To what extent do you agree or disagree with it 84
- Benefits and problems of studying and work related to old theater play in high schools .give your opinion with examples. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r traditional culture. Others doubt that learning these plays from long time ago ...
^^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t only helpful for the students to build a habit of critical thinking, but also p...
^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter is contrast with the requirements of modern society. Students in high school...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 325.0 242.827586207 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39076923077 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83695978618 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606153846154 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 8.0 1.56157635468 512% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5350698773 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.142857143 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184040729059 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066657992217 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690967851907 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11244856775 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468901710903 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.