The bar graph below depicts the information about four different transport modes used by people in a European City from 1960 to 2000.
The bar chart illustrates the number of people who have access to four different modes of transportation in a European City between 1960 and 2000. Overall, the only mode of transportation chosen by people in Europe was car experiencing a significant increase during the period, whereas the others reported a various trend of decrease.
To begin, despite starting at just above 5%, the number of car noticeably raised six-fold to be the highest figure in the beginning of the period, by overtaking the numbers of the other transport modes. Meanwhile, the figure for people choosing to walk, as the highest number in 1960, declined to just below a tenth during 40 years. This was similar to the number of bikers which had a 19-percent drop from 25% - the lowest number in the end of period. The passengers of bus also experienced a slight decrease of 2%, although the number of them grew to reach 36% in the early twenty years.
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. What are the advantages and disadvantages? 66
- Analysts tell us that many people today feel stressed and think they have insufficient control over their lives What problems do such feelings cause for people What remedies could you suggest 89
- Playing a musical instrument is the most important achievement for any child Personal Opinion agree or disagree 84
- The line graph below shows thefts per thousand cars in four countries between 1990 and 1999. 78
- The best way to educate children is by using the Internet in EVERY lesson To what extent do you share this opinion What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 770.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8125 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72845485158 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61875 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6236110796 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208052319409 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110817628072 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14271878375 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195274322216 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13153587358 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.