Nowadays more and more people want to get things done instantly (services, information, tasks) . Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
People these days have become more time oriented and expects to get all sorts of jobs done quickly. Any activity or process taking longer time than usual is not being favored by the society. This essay will evaluate the reasons behind this psychology and its positive consequences.
In this fast paced world, every individual seems to be running to keep up with their goals. Moreover, the advancement in technology since past few decades has automated myriad of activities. For example, before internet era, people used to browse through books and journals to search for particular information. Whereas any sort of information is now available on the click of a button, thanks to the internet. Similarly, to perofmr many of the daily routine tasks for instance paying the bills, people used to earlier stand in long queues and wait for their turn, On the other hand, bills can be paid online now in a jiff. All these technical innovations have made life easier and convenient. Consequently, people have become less patient and desire to achieve their work rapidly.
This shift in the mindsets is majorly a positive development and is beneficial to the society. Getting multiple things done in a shorter span of time has lead to increase in productivity. Time saved in performing a task can be utilized later on in an effective way. For instance, before the birth if messages and email system, people used to post letters to communicate business and personal related matters. These snail mails used to take 10 to 15 days to get delivered thereby delaying decisions on important subjects. On the contrary send an email to someone takes just a second.
To sum up, it’s a fact that people are preferring less turnaround time in case of many routine activities. This has improved the overall quality of life leading to less stressful and more peaceful life.
- You recently read an article in newspaper about someone you know personally. You found some information is wrong. Write a letter to editor to inform him about it. Use following points:1)What is the article about?2)What is the error?3)What you expect an ed 76
- Should long-term job seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community? 56
- The tendency of human being to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree? 67
- Fewer and fewer young people are choosing to become teachers Why do young people not want to become teachers How could this be changed 73
- Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams, e.g. football. However, some people think it is more beneficial to play individual sports, e.g.; tennis and swimming. Discuss about both views and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...forming a task can be utilized later on in an effective way. For instance, before the birth if mess...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: SEND_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'email'.
Suggestion: email
... on important subjects. On the contrary send an email to someone takes just a second. To s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...To sum up, it's a fact that people are preferring less turnaround time in case of many ro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, whereas, for example, for instance, sort of, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99038461538 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64821766256 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621794871795 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0320537764 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177390081493 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494520503328 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491982452631 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108657706009 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371845466867 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.