Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams, e.g. football. However, some people think it is more beneficial to play individual sports, e.g. tennis and swimming. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people argue that playing sports which requires a team has a lot of benefits, while other believe that individual sports activities are more advantageous. Although playing sport alone has its own benefits, this essay believes that playing sports in a team has much better results.
On the one hand, playing sport alone keeps you focused and independent. This means that there are no distractions while playing the sport and you can independently start and end the sport at your own pace and convenience. In other words, if you decide to choose a sport which requires a team or partner to be present then you cannot start the sporting activity unless your partner is also ready to get started. In addition to this, you might have your own goals for playing the sport, for example to stay fit and healthy but your partner has joined you just for the sake of doing it, then you may not be able to achieve the desired result and can lose your focus. However, despite the above argument, I believe playing sport in team has more benefits than playing sport alone.
On the other hand, playing in groups makes you a team player which affects not only your sporting abilities but also your social life. Playing in groups requires a lot of coordination with each other and encouragement from team members. For example, in a game like cricket if your team puts up a low score on board, the bowlers are encouraged to bowl well and to defend the score. Even if you lose the match, you appreciate everyone’s effort and shake hands with other team members also. This also develops your sportsman spirit. Accordingly, if individuals face any bad situation in their social life, this spirit of supporting each other learnt from the sport is alive and you support people across the globe. For example, the recent attacks in Syria have encouraged a lot of countries to send their donations to help people. Based on the above argument, I believe sporting in groups helps you to become well- grounded individuals.
In conclusion, although playing sport alone makes you independent and more focused towards your task, I believe that sporting activities in teams has greater benefits to the individual and society.
- Most countries allow 18 years old to start driving a car Some say it is good to allow it at this age while other think that the age to start driving should be at least 25 Discuss both sides and give your opinion 74
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of sports and gym. Some people believe that this is an effective way of improving your productivity, while others are of the opinion that there is no benefit in doing so. 67
- Some people believe that it is possible for a country to be economically progressive while having a clean environment at the same time. Some people disagree with this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that the government should ensure the healthy lifestyle of people, but others argue that it should be decided by individuals. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
- Some people say it is OK to use animal for our benefit, other say it is not good to exploit them. Discuss both point of view and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: YOUR[1]
Message: Did you mean 'you're' or 'you are'?
Suggestion: you're; you are
...ou a team player which affects not only your sporting abilities but also your social...
^^^^
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...and shake hands with other team members also. This also develops your sportsman spir...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87798408488 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5229996218 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488063660477 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9074142788 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.9375 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5625 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225530575023 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978648915649 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824417333599 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180810236842 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635791291973 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.