It is better for college students to live in schools than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe there will be more benefits for students to more from their home to schools’ accommodation. While colleges’ dormitories offer good studying environment, I disagree that it is better to live schools.
There are a few positive and negative aspects of living in schools that can be pointed out. When studying in schools, students can interact with their friends directly, which gets them better results in their studying. By working in groups, people can also develop their social skills which are necessary for their future jobs. In addition, students will not have to travel far for classes or libraries if they need to find some learning materials. However, although schools’ security has been vastly improved these days, there are still risks that personal belongings get stolen when students live with the others. After all, each individual is still a stranger to another even if they have been roommates for years. Also, people can be interrupted when they need absolute silence to focus on somethings.
Living and studying at home also have pros and cons. Firstly, it provides a familiar atmosphere for people to study. Therefore, students can calmly focus on their projects or assignments because they feel comfortable and safe in their own place. Secondly, unlike schools, there are no rules at home that restrict people from studying at the time and the place they want. Students can learn anywhere in the house at any time they desire. Lastly, spending time with family is much easier when staying at home, while it can only be arranged occasionally if they choose to move to schools’ accommodation. However, despite the convenience of learning at home, students do not have the perks which colleges’ dormitories offer.
In conclusion, I believe it is up to students to choose where they want to accommodate when enrolling in colleges because both schools and home have their own pros and cons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | chioma49 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | badboybmt123 | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | UYVO | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-08 | lemaina201 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-29 | MrDucPhD | 89 | view |
- Technology provides us a lot of means to communicate. But now that people have the ability to talk to each other in wider variety of methods, our communication and social abilities have taken a step back.Why does technological advancement hurt nontechnica 61
- More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas. Do you think it is a negative or positive development? 84
- You borrowed an important textbook during the last term from a classmate. You now realize your classmate had returned home overseas and you still have the book.Write a letter to him/her. In your letter:•apologize for the mistake•find out how important 73
- There is an increase in noise in our daily lives nowadays. Why is this a problem? What can be done to reduce it? 89
- Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what way has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'belongings'.
Suggestion: belongings
... these days, there are still risks that personal belongings get stolen when students live with the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, after all, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19936708861 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7658644234 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534810126582 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7580863609 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6470588235 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334702297476 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112373752691 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564180565524 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219685958331 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490215736359 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.