Critical judgement of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
The world is progressing at a tremendous rate which has resulted in cut throat competition among people. Everyone wants to excel in their fields and work to the best of their abilities. This has resulted in the division of education in specific narrow streams which provided specializations in just one course. Students invest many years in accumulating knowledge about their stream so they can play their part in the world’s development. So the student of one field will not understand the technique, the nuances and the mammoth effort that goes into the development of a product in the other field. Hence critical judgements which do not belong to the specific field should be definitely be considered but should not be thought about much since the people do not understand the know-how of that field. Hence the feedback of the work done in a specific field is of utmost importance if received from an expert in that field.
Our history is a testimony to many such examples where the layman without much knowledge in a field tries to make a comment and voice his opinion which, at many times have been rendered futile. In the early 18th Century, Copernicus and his adherents, through extensive research tried to prove that Earth is not the center of the universe and it is one of many other celestial bodies that revolve around the sun. This fact was not accepted very well among the masses and Copernicus was ostracized from the society by the church and the cathedral. However, later with the support of Gallelio, he went on to prove that his hypothesis was infact true. Hence one should not impart a lot of weight to the views of the outsiders of the field.
Consider, for instance, the field of sports. Why are the coaches of the teams or an individual the expert in that field? Because he would be the best to understand the game and help the talent grow by pointing out the exact flaws in his game in the correct manner. One of the legends in the game of football, Cristiano Ronaldo in one of his interviews asserted that whatever he has achieved is solely because of the critique received by him from his coach, Sir Alex Fergusan, whom he considers to be his football father. Football, being such a widely accepted, loved and adulated sport, many people who were not professional soccer players tried to comment on Ronaldo’s game. Among these two views presented in front of Ronaldo, the comments and feedback of Sir Alex gained more priority against the views from the public because Sir Alex was no novice, he knew all the details and intricacies of the sport and could help Ronaldo a lot more by sharing his knowledge about the game.
Our society is continuously changing and evolving. A lot of progress has already been made in all the fields, be it science, arts, or economics. Specializing in a field has become mandatory. These specializations have limited the limited the amount of a field being encompassed and deep knowledge about a specific phenomenon is imparted to a student. A masters student of dermatology will not know the details about cardiology even though both are considered to be included in the field of medicine and biology. For a person to advance in his particular field, the feedback and approval from an expert in his field becomes a must. The expert, through many years of experience has gained immense amount of knowledge which could be used to the benefit of the student.
However, one cannot take the opinions of the outsiders of the field for granted. Consider, the film fraternity for example. They make a film for their audiences and hence the feedback received from them is extremely valuable. The content that the audience wishes to see should be presented to them. How can one ignore the feedback of their consumers? If your end product is going to be used by consumers finally, their considerations of the product must be taken into account to make the product better. This feedback from the consumers and the knowledge of the experts must work in synergy for the advancement of work in a particular field.
In conclusion, though feedback from everyone, be it an expert in the field or a novice or even an outsider, should be considered but utmost amount of importance should be given from the valuable feedbacks and critical judgements received from the experts of a particular field since they have a knowledge and understanding of a field that nobody else possesses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-25 | kap1990 | 50 | view |
| 2018-10-25 | kap1990 | 50 | view |
| 2018-10-25 | Sabarnakha | 50 | view |
| 2018-10-13 | jaincharvi | 50 | view |
- All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems 83
- All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems 50
- Students should memorize facts only after they have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. Students who have learned only facts have learned very little 69
- Critical judgement of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 58
- Students should memorize facts only after they have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. Students who have learned only facts have learned very little 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 607, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...opment of a product in the other field. Hence critical judgements which do not belong...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 810, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... understand the know-how of that field. Hence the feedback of the work done in a spec...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ve that his hypothesis was infact true. Hence one should not impart a lot of weight t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld of sports. Why are the coaches of the teams or an individual the expert in tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'limited the'.
Suggestion: limited the
...e mandatory. These specializations have limited the limited the amount of a field being encompassed and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'masters'' or 'master's'?
Suggestion: masters'; master's
... phenomenon is imparted to a student. A masters student of dermatology will not know th...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of a field that nobody else possesses.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 121.0 58.6224719101 206% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3683.0 2235.4752809 165% => OK
No of words: 762.0 442.535393258 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.25398396302 4.55969084622 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69422795908 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 320.0 215.323595506 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.419947506562 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1139.4 704.065955056 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1033209283 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.606060606 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253647183914 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744557795302 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928050074162 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157930198548 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868444055654 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 100.480337079 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.