Whether studying films at school is as important as studying literature? Do you think school should have curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theater centuries ago?
Studying films at schools is as important as studying literature created heating argument among a certain group of people. Some people believe that study of a century-old drama and playing theatre arts by them in student career is beneficial in understanding human evolution and development. Others reject this notion and argue that education departments should not have included a separate curriculum as it wastage of time. I completely disagree with the statement that schools should not ask students to play old century drama. This essay would further elaborate both sides in detail with justifying reasons and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, the prime benefit of studying drama and other history art makes students aware of the traditions, cultures, customs, rituals, and lifestyle of people of bygone centuries. This awareness about various communities assists pupil in understanding human behaviors. For example, Shakespeare is not a famous dramatist in the 16th century but now his dramas hold the highest views in youtube. Besides this, young generations will learn lessons from this and will try to avoid those mistakes done by ancient people in the present era. Thus literature teaches younger students to travel on the right path and avoid wrong customs.
On the flip side, studying theatres during student career is considered as a sheer wastage of time and energy. In the fast-growing world, where youngsters are required to pay attention towards modern sciences and technologies which eventually help them to excel in academic and professional fields. Furthermore, drama, tragic, romantic plays of old days distract young generation minds. For example, in a society where more inventions are happening, students should be more concentrated on technologies that help them to choose a career in future.
To conclude, it is drawn that studying literature in schools and colleges is not beneficial for student growth. In a nutshell, high school students should pay more attention to modern developments and innovations instead of old play dramas.
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 83
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. 77
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion? 77
- technology and new inventions is it beneficial or detrimental to the society? 77
- International travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad minded. what are causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e by ancient people in the present era. Thus literature teaches younger students to ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ogies that help them to choose a career in future. To conclude, it is drawn that study...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 325.0 242.827586207 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43692307692 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86173034923 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603076923077 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2887260047 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4375 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.25397266985 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360513270979 0.242375264174 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114307494838 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105293663191 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22473044475 0.151781067708 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124860393855 0.0609392437508 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.