Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
Recently, the phenomenon of building more roads or improving the public transportation systems and its corresponding impacts sparked a heated debate. Although contest by many that completing public transportation facilities is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded both thoroughly constructive and positive by substantial numbers of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that more public transport network is essential, and this essay will examine both views of this regard by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
From a social and economic standpoint, instructing more roads could lead to improvement for vehicle industry as well as urban structure which ultimately could lead to creating more job opportunities. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I conducted an academic survey about a residential area and its roads which provide some noticeable results. Thus, the ramification of both public accommodation and city roads and their effects on transportation system apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, improving public transportation facilities could lead to decreasing traffic jam. Moreover, according to an academic research conducted by a prestigious university, encouraging city-dwellers to use public transport can bring many advantages to both society and individuals by diminishing detrimental effects of air pollution. Not to mention that using private cars could bring many disadvantages such as more accident and increasing the death rate among society.
To recapitulate, I Pen down saying that although some groups tend to support using of private vehicles and as a consequence, tend to support building more roads, I highly inclined to believe that improving public transportation systems should be planned by authorities as well as increasing public awareness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | lovedeepkaur2000 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Shruti gupta radhika | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | vahora juber | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | prabhdyal | 11 | view |
- Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs. What problems this causes? What are the solutions? 70
- Using of Over-packed food could be bad. to what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 11
- it's difficult to maintain the balance between work and other aspects of life such as family and leisure time, what is your opinion to keep it balanced. 77
- Some people think that people should choose their job based on income in order to provide security for their family Do you think money is an important factor when choosing a job What other factors should be considered 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, if, moreover, so, thus, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84926470588 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3298332168 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8738758276 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.1 104.977214359 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356422315007 0.242375264174 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13790762849 0.0925447433944 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878152931615 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217678986222 0.151781067708 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547334994909 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 12.6369458128 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.