Students in school and university learn far more from lessons with their teachers compared to other sources, such as television or the internet. Do you agree or disagree?
Learning methods can be categorized into at least two groups: first group is traditional learning method is schools and the second one is multi-media assisted methods mainly through the internet or TV. Some people posit that the traditional was is always the best while other stick to the modern methods like remote learning via computer or TV. This essay discusses both sides and provides a few reasons and examples why learning at school from teacher is more effective.
Generally speaking, it has been a great opportunity for the students that learning resources such as TV or the internet became available in recent years, These resources are readily accessible to public and as a matter of fact they can save a lot of unnecessary cost and energy as people can stay at home and learn. Take a remote university class for example; people can attend the virtual class, listen to the lectures, ask questions in the chatroom without even getting out of their room. I am pretty sure that every one agrees that remote learning resources are so precious but the question is that are they good enough to replace the schools and universities. In the next paragraph I will discuss demerits of such remote resources and provide some reasons why we must keep traditional learning methods.
Resources such as TV or the internet are virtual environments that can be used for learning but still possess a lot of other stuff like: online games, TV shows,... , that can be a source of distraction for learners. Therefore, student that is using such a resource is more prone to be distracted and it is a big disadvantage. Another demerit of remote learning resources is that people may procrastinate more before learning as they know it is always available on the internet or even if it is a TV program they know that the playback will be also shown another day. On the contrary, people sitting in a physical class listening to the professor never miss a chance to learn as they know the professor probably never repeats the materials.
Learning is so crucial for students and nowadays with availability of both schools and remote learning resources like TV and internet people can opt to pay attention to the quality of learning or their convenience during learning. I believe quality comes with more effort and think students should stick to their schools and universities for learning better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | yasirkhan111 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | yasirkhan111 | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 84 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 89 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 73 | view |
- You cannot go to a company where you got an offer. Write a letter to the HR supervisor to:Explain the reason why you decline the offerExpress your gratitudeExplain why you like your current job very much 73
- Write a letter to invite your friend to a music concert you are planning to go You should write What is the concert of the music concert When and where is the music concert Why do you think your friend will go to this concert 62
- Many students have to study subjects which they do not like. Some people think this is a complete waste of time. To what extent do you agree ot disagree with this statement? 56
- Television has improved the quality of life for the the ordinary person Do you agree or diagree 91
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing and bungee jumping? Explain your reasons 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...other stuff like: online games, TV shows,... , that can be a source of distraction...
^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r stuff like: online games, TV shows,... , that can be a source of distraction for...
^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...r schools and universities for learning better.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, while, at least, for example, such as, as a matter of fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93300248139 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69522973186 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496277915633 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.9767895988 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7857142857 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236236457912 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938288229817 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615137074725 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164886663778 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562278205546 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.