Students in school and university learn far more from lessons with their teachers compared to other sources, such as television or the internet. Do you agree or disagree?
By the innovation of new education methods, the requirement of face to face teaching has become more controversial than ever. Many experts still advocate attending in classes, while others believe self-study and other new learning methods would be more helpful.
Getting together in a classroom and listening to the teacher's lecture is a favourite method of education worldwide, even though it is a traditional one. Education is not just receiving information, but collaboration with others. Friendship as well as competition help students to boost their knowledge to a great level. A professional teacher can charge a student with a positive pulse that nothing else can do. According to a research done at the University of Michigan, those who based their learning on teacher's follow-up gained better social happiness which led them to a better success in their future life. Anyhow the side effects of absolute dependency on teachers and school curriculums should not be overlooked.
Thanks to the Internet and new innovative learning methods resulted by information technology, students are becoming less and less dependent to physical classrooms. Moreover, the huge amount of knowledge that is changing and updating every day, sometimes cannot be provided in just some sessions of classes. Nowadays many people share their knowledge and information via social media that are categorized and accessible at a high level. In such situations, traditional learning methods might not keep pace with the high rapid of knowledge rate which is inevitable in many fields. As an example, in software development, seldom do seniors rely only on teachers lectures when it comes to a high proficiency level. The more students practice to lessen their dependency on their teachers and keep themselves updated in their knowledge field, the better opportunities they may gain in their future jobs.
Overall, it seems although attending in school or university classes is essential for students for their base knowledge and learns how to cooperate with each other, the miracle of self-esteem helps them to gather more novel data from internet and other data providers. This can be a competitive advantage among others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | yasirkhan111 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | yasirkhan111 | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 84 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 89 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 73 | view |
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 88
- Students in school and university learn far more from lessons with their teachers compared to other sources such as television or the internet Do you agree or disagree 69
- Students in school and university learn far more from lessons with their teachers compared to other sources, such as television or the internet. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- An old friendis coming to town and has invited you to go to the cinema. Write to your friend. In your letterExplain that you are unable to comeFind out how long your friend is stayingin townArrange a suitable time to meet 51
- Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all lessons while others think they should focus on subjects in which they are stronger and they find interesting. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
...erlooked. Thanks to the Internet and new innovative learning methods resulted by informatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 731, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practice lessening'.
Suggestion: practice lessening
...gh proficiency level. The more students practice to lessen their dependency on their teachers and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40751445087 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9218338135 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580924855491 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9962850975 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.9375 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285015235841 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792549890397 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610373725321 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168956992823 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457260660844 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.