The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.
The chart shows how many male and female students were studying full-time or part-time in further education in Britain between 1970/71 and 1990/91. Overall, the vast majority of students were part-time and there were more students in 1990/91 than in 1970/71, especially women.
Looking firstly at part-time versus full-time study, it is clear that most students were part-time in each year shown in the chart. The number of part-time students was over 700,000 per gender per year, going as high as 1.1 million, whereas for full-time study the number was between 70,000 and 250,000.
Moving on to look at gender differences, numbers of female students increased in both full-time and part-time education whereas the number of males in part-time education decreased. For example, there were 70,000 full-time and about 750,000 part-time female students in 1970/71, but by 1990/91 these numbers had risen to over 200,000 full-time and around 1.1 million part-time. The number of male full-time students also went up from around 100,000 in 1970/71 to over 200,000 in 1990/91, whereas for part-time study their numbers went down from 1 million in 1970/71 to around 850,000 in 1980/81, before rising slightly to about 900,000 in 1990/91.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | Piya Bera | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | Nihad | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Shivam7090 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | azizkhon | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | phamngocduyen | 67 | view |
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 61
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 75
- The charts below show information on crime in the US for 2002. Write a report for a universal lecturer describing the information below. 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years. 67
- Given are two pie charts displaying the categories of the annual spending divided by families in Canada between 1972 and 2002. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, so, whereas, as for, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3112244898 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47092105374 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.0645795113 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.714285714 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392505145102 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.260638931949 0.103423049105 252% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953897299946 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318234928389 0.15604864568 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291131831693 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.