1. In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What are your opinions on this?
In recent years, there are many children who are participated in some different paid work while some people believe that it is completely wrong for children to find such jobs, I think that young generation will get more experience and duties in the real workplace.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why some commentators argue that children should not suit to find a paid job. Firstly, they are still young and do not have a responsibility to look for money, so this duty belongs to their parents and society. Secondly, kids may not have sufficient knowledge as well as the experience like adults, especially heath to join the workforce. For example, if they work for a long-term, their physical bodies may be affected or even suffer poor health in future.
On the other hand, I have the same view with a consideration that it is valuable for children to conduct a number of simple jobs. It can be said that children will broaden their understanding and experience which help them encounter number of obstacles in a real world. Besides, this encourages children more responsible for their families and society. For instance, in some developed countries, there are a huge number of children at high schools who are allowed to experience a paid job during break term. Thus, they may not only gain valuable knowledge and experience in the workplace but also save adequate individual budget which is used for purchasing course books or paying study fees. Furthermore, it is significant that they will have a variety of chances to learn real lessons that they never study at school. As a result, this leads them to deeper insight into the current workplace that their parents are working.
In conclusion, although there are some arguments that children are wrong when engaging in some kind of paid work, they will have more substantial work experience and learn more about responsibilities in their lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Utkarsh2103 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | r.hojat | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-29 | Vladislav 457 | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-15 | iamcrypticcoder | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-12 | Həsən | 56 | view |
- Many people go to university for academic study. More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 76
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The world natural resources are being consumed at an ever-increasing rate. What are the dangers of this situation? What should we do? 78
- The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools.’ How far do you agree with this prediction? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... be affected or even suffer poor health in future. On the other hand, I have the same vi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94409937888 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72224057113 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537267080745 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0059797279 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.461538462 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.4615384615 7.06120827912 233% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283363999066 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976866354274 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844887410239 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205895165416 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707785718752 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.