Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
The issue that who is allowed to critic any piece of work in any field is controversial. Arguments can be made in both the sides. In my opinion, it is not fixed that whether only experts are allowed to critic any work or everyone,it largely depends on the field and significance of the work.
Everyone may not always be eligible to critic a work. In some field everyone may not have the depth of knowledge or expertise to comment on a piece of work. For example, a common man can not comment on a drawing made by a legendary artist. He is not expert or trained to understand the details such as strokes and use of colors or what the artist is trying to depict in drawing. An expert is required to understand such things. Such piece of work is mostly not be related to common people and his for a selected few.
On the other hand, there examples where anyone with a reasonable senses can understand and comment on some work. This works are not erudite and deal with common people. For example, a new gadget made by some company. Anyone can critic its usefulness and features. Also in such cases common people's opinion is most valuable. Most work that fits in this category is made for people or have to deal with people. Other examples include government policies or work of a leader.
However, in some cases work can be judged by anyone, but the depth of judgement by common people and an expert is different. For example, people can judge a sportsperson by his records and other statistics. But a veteran sportsperson of the same game can also understand the style of his game, what decision he makes during the game or his performance in critical situations. . A player may be revered by common people but experts may not like his game.
In the end, it is completely dependent on what work is to be judged and what field it belongs to. Common people may be eligible to critic it or may not or even judgement of common and experts may differ in significant manner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | jinjer | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 58
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 50
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...e allowed to critic any work or everyone,it largely depends on the field and signif...
^^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'sens', 'sense'?
Suggestion: sens; sense
...examples where anyone with a reasonable senses can understand and comment on some work...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 377, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...his performance in critical situations. . A player may be revered by common peopl...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, for example, such as, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 358.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51396648045 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52635951058 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413407821229 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4927254157 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.4545454545 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194938219991 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688993834101 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08032608891 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136933408808 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934181774476 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 14.1392134831 56% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.