“Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.”
There are two types of people in the world. One who believes that government officials must carry out what their people wants and other believes that government officials should take decision based on their own judgment. However, government officials should understand demands of people they serve and then based on their judgment they should decide what to do first.
Government officials are public servants. They are elected to solve people problems. If they don't know what people wants from them then there may increase the problems. If they understand problems of people then they may serve them well. For example, in the democratic countries, government officials are elected by people and there are elected to serve people. If they don't serve well enough then they might not re-elected. So, it is beneficial to government official that they should carry out will of the people.
However, sometimes government officials should base their own decisions based on their experienced and knowledge. People want everything in a very short amount of time. Sometimes their demands are poor. For example, in a poor area, government official must take their own decision rather than demands of people where people are unable to understand their needs. Thus in some situations, experience of government officials are more important.
Officials should take peoples demands and make decision based on their experience is better idea than others. Official must take peoples demand in considerations and then they set priority based on their own judgment. For example, If people wants 24/7 water supply and mobile phones then water supply should be priority of government. So, government official must know what their priorities are.
In conclusion, Government officials should consider people's will for sure, but also base their decisions based on their judgment. Sometimes they must take their own decision based on their judgment and set priorities to complete the work of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | DH123 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | ghazalsaed1995 | 75 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | seonjungkim | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | sudesh tiwari | 58 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | Lutfor Rahman Rony | 66 | view |
- According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic en 23
- The article is talking about "let is burn" policy. Article states that this policy caused more damage to everyone and give an example of Yellowstone in 1980 which is most famous national park where it burned for two months and spread over huge area and gi 70
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company."Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One 50
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y are elected to solve people problems. If they dont know what people wants from t...
^^
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ected to solve people problems. If they dont know what people wants from them then t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...m then there may increase the problems. If they understand problems of people then...
^^
Line 2, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... and there are elected to serve people. If they dont serve well enough then they m...
^^
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...re are elected to serve people. If they dont serve well enough then they might not r...
^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e are unable to understand their needs. Thus in some situations, experience of gover...
^^^^
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...bile phones then water supply should be priority of government. So, government official ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 312.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36538461538 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57053480072 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 215.323595506 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.394230769231 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2554766629 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7142857143 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8571428571 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.58843728866 0.243740707755 241% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217664534985 0.0831039109588 262% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147552733187 0.0758088955206 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.414489740411 0.150359130593 276% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118735732376 0.0667264976115 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.27 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.38706741573 80% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 100.480337079 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.