Nowadays, many families have both parents working. Some working parents believe that other family members can take care of their children, while others think childcare centers are better. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Living in this costly world is difficult without money, where both the parent has to work for better survival conditions in their family. Now the question arises to the caretaking of their kids. In which some think that caretaking of their children can be effectively done by other family members, while on the other hand, some think the best option is childcare centres. In this essay, both the views will be discussed in detail in the following paragraphs.
Caretaking is the most important part of a child’s growth and can be well supported by other family members like Grandparents or Aunt and Uncle. Needless to say, the bringing up of a child under grandparents is highly rich in cultural, traditional, and rituals parts. The kids grown under their grandparents are more attached to family and relatives and in return, the children are loved by every member of a family. Hence, the caretaking of kids under blood relatives is unquestionable and is highly beneficial to the family in terms of bonding in between family members.
Professional caretaking under childcare centres is helpful for the working parents in terms of the development of kids in advancement and learning acts quickly. Although they are advanced in using technology to keep entertaining kids and building their brains. Nevertheless, they are all professionals and doubt of trust always. Moreover, in a professional care centre, they have multiple numbers of kids and it is difficult to give special attention to one kid.
In conclusion, both the options have their own benefits for the kids and their parents. Although there are certain drawbacks in professional caretaking at care centres. Hence I believe, the best caretaking is under the surveillance of blood relatives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-05 | Hamed H | 61 | view |
| 2018-11-12 | SATPREET SINGH | 67 | view |
- Some parents believe that reading books for entertainment is a waste of time for children and they think that their children should only read serious educational books.Do you agree or disagree? 56
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Leader and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress, because what matters is the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...re all professionals and doubt of trust always. Moreover, in a professional care centr...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...enefits for the kids and their parents. Although there are certain drawbacks in professi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...rofessional caretaking at care centres. Hence I believe, the best caretaking is under...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19649122807 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93784174649 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529824561404 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8948054158 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296305147225 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861882126444 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789618799649 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169329861559 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109593931189 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.