Nowadays it is more difficult for children to concentrate to pay attention in school.
Discuss the causes and propose some solutions.
The recent decades has seen a growth in discussion of learning quality of our new generation. One of the phenomenon most concerned is the rising difficulties for children to get immersed in their studies. In this essay, I will explore the reasons behind this perplexing situation and suggest a remedy for this.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that children are susceptible to distraction derived from technical development in earlier decades. Having been found with the emergence of the Internet, tools of social networking such as Facebook and Instagram have dominated the pastime of people, ranging from juvenile to adult. Meanwhile, students who are living in their formative years are highly inquisitive, and their curiosities are thus responsible for straying themselves from backbreaking assignement they are weary of.
Further and more importantly, though, I would contend that both teachers and their parents have an onus on enlightening our teenagers on restraining the obsession. Noteworthy is the fact that the aforementioned technology has a vitally important role to play in terms of academic research; thus prohibiting the accessibility of it tends to further impoverish the circumstance, while the perception of time management and assistance of prioritising activities are likely to counteract the detriments it brough along.
By way of conclusion, I believe the societal trend is imminent in foreseeable future. Under the auspices of parents and teachers, some advance skills that can alleviate the drawbacks would be warranted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-28 | RockyGagKy | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | RockyGagKy | 84 | view |
- Describe a custom from your country that you would like people from other countries to adopt.Explain your choice, using specific reasons and examples. 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communications, such as letters, emails, or telephone calls.Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 89
- The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
The recent decades has seen a growth in discussion of learning...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, thus, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54811715481 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18846571488 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.661087866109 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.9013351016 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.6 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0834816115946 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.029904702501 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0245877333065 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0438142983411 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274897691607 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.