Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sport facilities that every can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
These days, some nations would rather reach global sports by constructing specialized infrastructure to train top athletes than subsidize facilities which everyone could use for sport. In my opinion, it is drawbacks.
On a hand, the government could spend an amount of money on building specialized facilities. It means that to have sport centers which educate talent people to become gifted athletes would waste a lot of money and time. There are two main reasons to explain for it. Initially, looking for talent young people could spend much time and money. In addition, there are a lot of facilities which are used for sport have to be updated and cared for frequently. For example, some countries could expend 10 million dollars on training young athletes while others only spend 1 million dollars on providing sport facilities which their every citizen could use every day. It causes that the government would have to waste a lot of money on sports, instead of develop other majors. Therefore, building specialized sport centers to train talent people is not the best way to achieve many records in the world.
On other hand, top athletes would have the best education and grow their talent. In other words, there are not many people who are interested in playing sport every day. It is because a big part of people are officers who are too busy to train frequently sports. For instance, there are many people who prefer spending their free time on staying family and friends to training sports. Thus, it seems to be essential for the government to subsidize specialized and expensive facilities for everyone.
In conclusion, some countries want to reach global sports by building many specialized facilities to train gifted people, instead of subsidizing them for citizens. In my point, this way has some its negative aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-02 | Thien Trang | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-02 | Thien Trang | 56 | view |
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 56
- Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in UK between 1971 and 2001. Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data. 78
- Some people think that the main benefit of greater international cooperation is in the protection of environment while others think that it is in the world business. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. Why? How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this way has some its negative aspects.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04605263158 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59166273273 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480263157895 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2807466895 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2352941176 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294966191021 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946538118875 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864494577854 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216108193823 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712476226899 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.