Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's world, universities play an important role in paving the way for societies to reach the success's peak by educating people. With this in mind, a controversy exists whether universities should force students to take a history course or not regardless of their field of study. Some people believe that it is logical to university oblige student to take history courses, while others hold the opinion that it is not logical. I, personally, am of opinion that the university should not be required students to take history course for some reason, two of which are lacking the interest and attend, wasting of the time that will be substantiated in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, forcing students to take history courses regardless of their major brings about some probems such as not attending the class, beacause they are not interested in history courses; otherwise, students could choose history for their major. When a student is not a fond of a course in general and the history course in particular, it would be implausibe to force them to take the course. Take my experience as an illustrative example. I am an petroleum engineer; When I was a 21-year-old and junior student, I was focusing on my field of study and was working on my own project to develop a new method for petroleum industry, I was told that I should take a history course, otherwise I would not be able to be graduated from university. At that time, I complained about this new regulation, but I had no choice except taking the history course. Even though I took the course and brought about that I distracted from my project, but I did not attend the class anymore, so after a while, the university found that this new regulation was not practical and thought that they should not have used it, and finally they would not do it again.
The other reason that worth mentioninig in order to support my idea that obliging students to take history course is not a good idea is that it would be a waste of money and nothing else. Universities can invest the money on some special and technical courses which are more beneficial for students instead of using the money on holding the history course for students whom the history are not their major. The more logical is your decision, the more sensibel would be the result. If universities do not force students to take an irrelevant course, the university and students will be successful because they can focus on their own major. A recent research which is conducted by a renowned university on all university around Iran, the results have shown that universities that oblige students to take an irrelevant course are not as successful as other universities which do not force students. The most important reason behind this difference is because of wasting the money which was invested in the irrelevant course that had not and practical effect.
All in all, by taking all the aforementioned reason, one can conclude that it would not a geeod idea to universities force students to take a history curse because not only are the students lack interest in the history course but also it would be a waste of money. I strongly recommend that university does not force student to take irrelevant courses such as history courses which are irrelevant to student that are not majoring in the history.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-30 | anne19960314 | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-12 - Integrated Writing TaskJane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she loo 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing TaskPrivate collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other larg 73
- TPO 45- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...rience as an illustrative example. I am an petroleum engineer; When I was a 21-yea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, while, as to, in general, in particular, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.0286738351 245% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2766.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 574.0 407.700716846 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81881533101 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89472135074 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70003145268 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.393728222997 0.524837075471 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 894.6 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3488214408 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.666666667 100.406767564 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8888888889 20.6045352989 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351965175585 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134731704437 0.076458572812 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680462890548 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252458111868 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221163825067 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 11.7677419355 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.