Mass tourism is becoming more popular than ever before. Is it a positive or negative development?
In recent years, there has been more and more people favored in form of travelling called mass tourism. Although I agree that this kind of tourism bring a ton of benefits. I do not believe that masstourism has a sustainable development.
There are a variety of reasons why touring with a lot of people are beneficial. Firstly, this form of travelling help people to save a huge amount of. There budget by booking available tours. It means that expenses spent on budget-friendly tourism packages which created by co-operating of tour operators, transportation companies, hotels and restaurants are much more lower than that of self-payment. Secondly, mass tourism also brings jobs to stimulate economy of country. Forming and activating tour companies create a chain of services which needs a vast of employees. For example, tour guides will lose his or her job if travelling tour does not exist, not mention to related jobs such as hotel and restaurant managements or even receptionists.
However, there are some disadvantages to take into consideration while accelerating mass tourism. Perhaps the principal one is that if there exists a bad management with flocking tourists, destination might be affected, damaged or even destroyed by the lacking of awareness of some people. Consequently, there is a gradual erosion in landscape and values of tourist attraction. In addition, visitors might not have an immaculate trip because of crowded people. When surrounded by a wide range of people, it is definitely unconvinient to go sight-seeing, snap photos or just enjoy the beauty of tourist sites. Thus, towards people loving travelling should, either avoid visiting in peak times or else go alone to admire perfectly the view.
In conclusion, although profitable, over tourism is consider an exploitative and unsustainable form of travel and it requires a co-odination between local community, tour operators and visitors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-19 | chino0301 | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-15 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-09 | RkmsU | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-06 | Tuan Harry | 93 | view |
| 2024-09-02 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...form of travelling called mass tourism. Although I agree that this kind of tourism bring...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'lower' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: lower
...panies, hotels and restaurants are much more lower than that of self-payment. Secondly, ma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 53, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...n, although profitable, over tourism is consider an exploitative and unsustainable form ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34539473684 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14352370071 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641447368421 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.8781705183 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5882352941 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116789950657 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362159121259 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577173142626 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771330533238 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053661864176 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.