It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past even if it will be expensive to do so. What’s your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of preserving old monuments and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that it is an indispensable to preserve old buildings and it is highly beneficial for the nation, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effectiveness of old monuments can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, saving old beautiful buildings like mansions, coffee house and museum can provide nation with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of keeping culture value and heritage alive, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment on historical buildings which discovered the influence of old architectural monuments in improving tourism industry of any nation. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both keeping memories alive of our ancestors and gaining knowledge about history apparently can be seen.
From a realm of government, maintaining old architectural buildings might increase the consequences of unbalanced budget. Moreover, fundamental aspects of old monuments could relate to this reality that the demerits of preservation historical buildings pertain to extra expense which could have used for other problems. As a tangible example, some academic research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of old buildings is correlated negatively with significant decrease in nation’s beauty. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of preserving old beautiful building far outweigh its drawback. However, government should be prudent enough to have fruitful outcomes of this phenomenon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-24 | Baljinder Kaur | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-20 | Baljinder Kaur | 77 | view |
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past even if it will be expensive to do so. What’s your opinion? 77
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 84
- If you are assigned to work on climate change what will you choose to focus on and why? 11
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, do you think cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s like mansions, coffee house and museum can provide nation with some noticeable ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74915254237 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25511287656 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616949152542 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9187408114 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.333333333 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141549284505 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509938870984 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264632659138 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905784213934 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181743706243 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.