Education for young people is important in many countries. However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who cannot read and write. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Educating the young has always been the main focus in many countries. However, some argue that whether this should be the time for governments to pay attention and invest more in the literal education for adults as the number of people who cannot read and write are increasing nowadays. In my opinion, I believe that the authority should continue to focus on the developing of young generations rather than spending money on this particular group of adults.
To begin with, it is absolutely unnecessary to put revenue on the education of the grown-ups for their reading and writing problems. As these people usually accept low-average occupations which unnoticeably contribute to the nation, investing in teaching this portion of population seems to be pointless. Additionally, reading and writing skills are only required in academic purposes. Thus, there is no reason for these individuals to study when they are mainly in need of speaking ability to communicate in a daily basis.
On the contrary, concentrating on delivering high level education to young people brings substantial benefits to the growth of countries in the future. Firstly, since young students are the potential workforce, investing more budget in the studying of the young will assure a great supply of high-skilled workers in majors that surely return the national revenue an enormous favor. Secondly, since young people learn faster and more effectively, the money to pay for tutors and institutes should not be as costly as the adults’ education for they need more efforts from teachers in their study. This means that governments will save a great deal of money when they choose to focus on young generations’ education.
In conclusion, I believe that governments should spend money on young students rather than investing in the education of people who cannot read and write.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-28 | doquytuan | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Evelyn_Han | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | IVANTRUONG | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | IVANTRUONG | 67 | view |
- The increase in people s life expectancy means that they have to work older to pay for their retirement One alternative is that people start to work at a younger age Is this alternative a positive or negative development 71
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now 'one big traffic jam'.How true do you think this statement is?What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? 73
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now 'one big traffic jam'.How true do you think this statement is?What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? 73
- Some people consider price as the most important thing to consider when buying a product (such as a cellphone) or a service (e.g medical treatment) do you agree or disagree? 73
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now 'one big traffic jam'.How true do you think this statement is?What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...Educating the young has always been the main focus in many countries. However, some argue ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26421404682 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89272332489 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6714466831 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.166666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412772173178 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150064215271 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111498159435 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278839482057 0.151304729494 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934407583049 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.