the only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Many people believe that traffic problems are directly linked to the high volumes of commuters who travel to work,schools and shopping as a part of their daily routine. While I personally agree with the necessity of reducing the traveling needs, I believe that this is not the solely approach to arrest the issue.
Apparently, the ever-increasing innovation of technological advancements has made it feasible for modern societies to apply this measure. For instance, thanks to the introduction of the Internet, businesspeople are able to perform transactions with their foreign partners without any difficulties. Likewise, it is applicable for learners to get access to lectures at the comforts of their houses.Simultaneously,online services have given way to a more convenient buying methods for consumers. In short, without having people travel to fulfill their daily tasks, the application of technology has had a positive impact on the cities’ amount of traffic.
Nevertheless, there are other practical methods potentially addressing the traffic-related issues presently. The useof public transport provides a typical example. Cities’ authorities can enhance the popularity of buses or trains by upgrading the quality of the service as well as promoting this means on television or radio station as well. If commuters are inclined to use these state-financed types of transport instead of private vehicles, not only will the traffic congestion be dealt with but also people will still be capable of sustaining their social interactions as usual.
To sum up, I have to reiterate the importance of decreasing the demand for traveling from home to workplace, schools and shops to solve the current traffic situation. Besides, alternative solutions such as public transport systemscould also result in satisfactory outcome.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-12 | banike | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-26 | Malkeet sokhal | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-26 | Malkeet sokhal | 56 | view |
| 2015-06-19 | suherlan | 50 | view |
| 2015-06-12 | yoghieuin | 60 | view |
- the only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- The diagrams below show how glass containers such as bottles, are produced and recycled. 56
- The 11
- the world is experiencing a dramatic increase in population. 78
- library should provide more books rather than new tecnology such as computer and e-books. What extend do you agree or disagree. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , schools
... volumes of commuters who travel to work,schools and shopping as a part of their daily r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Simultaneously
...ectures at the comforts of their houses.Simultaneously,online services have given way to a mor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , online
... comforts of their houses.Simultaneously,online services have given way to a more conve...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, still, well, while, for instance, in short, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65703971119 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47952643674 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642599277978 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7043640027 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.583333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227336158003 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674960494872 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494261882392 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121145719721 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384630841262 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.