The bar chart below show the medical research funding on some diseases and deaths caused due to them in someland in1990. (figs in millions)
The bar chart represent the medical research funding on some diseases in someland in year 1990 along with the number of deaths caused by them. The data is calibrated in figures in millions.
The major portion of funds i.e. about 175 million were allotted for AIDS. However, 0.2 million people died from AIDS in same year. Leprosy and tropical diseases were given about 75 million units each while the former took 0.1 million lives followed by latter who killed 0.3 million masses.
Proceeding further, almost 60 million units were credited for diarrhoea which was the reason behind 0.5 million casualties. About 0.4 million people died of malaria whereas, 50 million funds were allocated to the same. T.B was responsible for large number of deaths which were of about 1.8 million people. However, this disease was funded with least sum of funds which were just 20 million units.
Overall, it is clearly depicted that the large part of medical research funds were utilised for AIDS . However, the least sum of money was used for T.B which was the reason for large number of mortality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-27 | harniitkaur | 92 | view |
- Some people think it is good thing for senior management positions to have very high salaries compared to other workers of the same company or organisation. To what extent you agree? 61
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 73
- The bar chart below show the medical research funding on some diseases and deaths caused due to them in someland in1990 figs in millions 92
- Nowadays many people are diagnosed qith anorexia. What do you think the causes of this are? What can be done to improve the situation? 61
- The diagram below shows the working of a refrigerator 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s calibrated in figures in millions. The major portion of funds i.e. about 175 m...
^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: B
...ion funds were allocated to the same. T.B was responsible for large number of dea...
^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...eople. However, this disease was funded with least sum of funds which were just 20 million...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...al research funds were utilised for AIDS . However, the least sum of money was use...
^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: B
..., the least sum of money was used for T.B which was the reason for large number o...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96721311475 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18458656918 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584699453552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3224968351 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6363636364 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258305802311 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111719089778 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124647610828 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188938554833 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133934862536 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.