Effective learning requires time, peace and comfort and should not be mixed with employment. Study and employment do not go hand-in-hand. To what extent do you agree with the above statements.
It is said that to learn efficiently one needs proper time and devotion towards the subject and should not be mixed with any other work. However, some people say that employment combined with study is beneficial in various aspects of life. I am inclined towards the fact that while the attainment of education, employment acts as an extra support, therefore should be considered.
To commence, there are numerous reasons why learning should be mixed with employment, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that it provides extra support in the expenditures of students, and above all one will be able to pay the fees by oneself which will lessen the burden on the family. Also, an individual will get independent and will have the early exposure of the job experience which will help one in future endeavors. As an illustration, one of my friends started working while he was studying which made him confident and skillful, and eventually he got a well reputed job in the corporate sector due to his experience. Thus, beneficial ramifications of mixing both can be seen.
Although some people contend with the counter saying that, doing study and job simultaneously will mess up a person’s schedule and distracts a student from the studies. By doing study and work together, pupils will not be able to concentrate properly on either one. Significantly, learners will more likely fail in their examinations, and will not be able to finish their assignments and projects on time due to bifurcated time. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of mixing learning with employment which is problematic.
To recapitulate, it can be articulated that benefits of studying and employment side by side are prominent, and far outweighs the drawbacks. Not only the advantages of work and learning together prove the significance of a better future, but also pinpoints of the fruitfulness implications.
- International travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad minded What are its causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem 87
- What are the pros and cons of extreme sports? 85
- Medical technology is responsible for the longevity of human life. Is it a curse or a blessing? To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- What is the best invention of last 100 years: computer, antibiotics, and airplane? Explain why? 55
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of cashless society? Discuss. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 315.0 242.827586207 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12698412698 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01083288119 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568253968254 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.931034482759 644% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4754751192 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.230769231 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234564206245 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890487953921 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543767006104 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146296424261 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581016110533 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.