Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Some people believe that everyone should follow the just laws and disobey the unjust laws without regards to the circumstance or individual’s opinion or judgment because it is our responsibility to do so. However, I do not completely agree with the claim.
First of all, there are laws that are clearly inhuman and wrong. In those cases, those laws are not beneficial to the society instead they could be harmful. For example, many years ago in Germany, the Nazi had laws that were absolutely unjustifiable and inhuman. Their laws like killing people who were not fair skin or blue eyes or using people for experiment against their will were just racist and immoral. Those laws were against our conscience. Just because they are the laws, it does not mean that we should follow them. If we just blindly follow the laws, we could be doing harm to our society and humanity.
It is understandable that some think that following the just laws are important in order to keep our society in order and safe. Whereas, breaking the laws are bad for the society and could cause chaos, so we should disobey and resist the unjust laws. It is everyone’s responsibility to do what is best for our society. However, there are circumstances that we need to set the laws aside and make decisions based on our judgment and righteousness despite breaking the laws. For example, Eric’s wife is dying and she needs money for medication in order to save her life. While Eric is walking to the hospital to see his wife, he sees money on the floor that he could use to buy medication and save his wife’s life. However, the laws require people to give the money to the police, and taking the money you find without giving it to the police is considered a crime. In the end, Eric decides to take the money and use it to buy medication to save his wife’s life. His action of not being able to disobey or resist the unjust laws is able to save a person’s life. However, if he decided to give the money to the police, his wife would have died. In this kind of situation, it is important to make decisions based on our own righteousness instead of following the just laws.
There are situations where following the just laws are not the best idea and some laws just should not be followed. As a result, I can agree with the claim that we should obey the just laws and disobey the unjust laws.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Abhipray Singh | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Jolly1111111 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Bonjourkmm | 58 | view |
- According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic en 23
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 63
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure 50
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o not completely agree with the claim. First of all, there are laws that are cl...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oing harm to our society and humanity. It is understandable that some think tha...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss instead of following the just laws. There are situations where following the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, whereas, while, for example, kind of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61682242991 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59131004766 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413551401869 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1510698701 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8181818182 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95454545455 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212326352347 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733588288587 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658611259155 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167592917344 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584136333601 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.38706741573 80% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.