A county becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and negative effects on the society due to multi-cultural effects on country development. While it is possible to claim that multi culture provides negative points for a country development, my point of view that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay I shall discuss my point of view, while analyzing both sides of the argument.
First and foremost, there are myriad of advantages a country can gain for its development, because of a multi-cultural nation, such as multi viewpoints, inheritance of ancient technology and education about other cultures. On the other hand, multi culture of a country will increase the diversity of the population, while providing more interest. For example, Australia has a multi culture, because of that the Australian nation became a developed nation. Not only that as a nation Australia has an interesting culture. Because of the above point, it is believed that the mixture of nationalities assists to country development while updating the heritage of the nation.
On the other hand, those who believe the other side of the argument have a different point of view and say multi culture develop complex county. For instances, African countries consist of cultural issues, although it consists of different nations. Therefore, it is believed that the multi culture destroys a nation. But, we can see more positive examples that negative examples related to mix culture.
In conclusion, it is strongly believed that the multi culture as a general term with the effects of globalization. In nutshell, it is strongly recommended, professionals’ and government interference are essential to spread this concept throughout the globe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-25 | Keiwan | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | baran.bahrani | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | lalacamargo1 | 77 | view |
| 2018-12-14 | Anil_PTE | 11 | view |
| 2018-12-14 | Anil_PTE | 11 | view |
- The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization. How far you agree? 77
- ‘Environmental problems are too great to be manage by individuals so real change can be achieved at governments level’To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own ex 77
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss. 72
- As a result of advance in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive, development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support you 55
- Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (busies, trains, subways)? Why? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your knowle 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ead this concept throughout the globe.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42446043165 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13862886457 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517985611511 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.71428571429 408% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8780901189 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0588241410026 0.242375264174 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0251513030437 0.0925447433944 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311107082824 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0324011970688 0.151781067708 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355558725282 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.