A county becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and negative effects on the society due to a mixture of a population of a country, and its development. While it is possible to claim that the mixture of nationalities destroy the development of a nation, my point of view that the advantages of keeping various nationalities outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analyzing negative and positive effects on a country and individuals' development due to different nationalities.
First and foremost, there are myriad of country development benefits can gain because of a mixture of nationalities, such as different viewpoints in the economy, socio-economic growth, and improvement of confidentiality and integrity among civil society. On the other hand, this will improve the security, responsibility, and accountability of individuals'. For example, Australia has a multicultural society and it became a developed country within the last few decades. Therefore, it is taken into account that the mixture of nationalities will improve the development while keeping the encapsulation and heritage of their unique ideas.
On the other hand, those who believe that the mixture of nationalities destroys the country development have a different point of view and say, this directly affect for the quality and security of a country. For instance, Sri Lanka had a civil war among different nationalities. Therefore, it is taken into consideration that the multicultural nation destroys its country development. But, there are more countries overcome this matter using internal rules and regulations.
In conclusion, it is strongly believed that the mixture of nationalities always helps to the country development. In nutshell, it is strongly taken into account that the governments' and the professionals' should handle nationalities related issues by using new rules and regulations in a cognitive manner.
- Some people suggest that each family should only have one car and encourage alternative vehicle.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 77
- Some people think that parent should teach children ho to be a good member of the society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 77
- As a result of advance in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive, development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support you 55
- Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (busies, trains, subways)? Why? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your knowle 72
- Do you think card less society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...nt point of view and say, this directly affect for the quality and security of a country. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a cognitive manner" with adverb for "cognitive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...sues by using new rules and regulations in a cognitive manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 302.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5761589404 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43107719077 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483443708609 0.580463131201 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.9 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5844188251 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.538461538 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113779905799 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438756862532 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0238054009676 0.071462118173 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694058350693 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029104840428 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.