Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
I totally disagree with the stated issue as laws are basic element of the democracy and help to build secured society. In any manner, it shall not be compensated or compromised. Laws are made to make life easier and to avoid anyones influence on others life.
Firstly, flexibility in the law may seem better idea but it probably may lead to misuse. Generally, such provisions are not come to rescue to lower class or middle class families. Renowned personalities like industrialist, filmstars and celebrities most likely to misuse such flexibility. They are trapped in controversy and had to face such cases. In such situations they may have a chance to get rid of commensurate punishment of their offence which is not the case for any ordinary people. For an example, any celebrity who is involved in hit and run case, will definatly not going to prison due to such provision. They either hire expensive lawyer who helps him to take support of existing law or they may choose an option of bribery.
Politicians are also in the same category when such provision is being useful to anyone. They know laws well and are not afraid of doing any ignoble act. When they are debunked, they know how to get rid of the situation and purpose of such provision fails and country faces dibacle.
Apart from this, corruption may increase in the society due to such flexibility in the laws. Any person who is involved in minor cases and does not want to mess anything up with his/her life may go for bribe. For an example, driving without seat belt or while talking on cell is offensive act. In such cases, person generally choose to give bribe to authority rather than paying huge fine, if time and place shall be taken into account in cosideration of such offense.
Conclusively, law of any society or nation shall not be compromised. Lawmaker shall continuously keep analysing and eliminate if there is any loophole. Nation with well defined and well structured law struggled at start to get habituated with system but at long run, it grows rapidly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | jason123 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 16 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | p30kh40 | 50 | view |
- School policies should be based as much on what employers want as well as what students and teachers want. 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- The real talent of popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 33
- The purpose of education should be to provide students with a value system, a standard, a set of ideas-not to prepare them for a specific job. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...asier and to avoid anyones influence on others life. Firstly, flexibility in the la...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, well, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8045325779 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6513583131 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580736543909 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9230262507 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.8 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133772883577 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441889262258 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039913171892 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788413524159 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179949316529 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.