The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars?.
Using cars have been part of our daily life. It is essential for it provided us comfort and convenience in traveling from one place to another. However, there are several issues that arise from using it which I will outline in this essay.
There are four main concerns associated with the usage of cars, one of them is the environmental problem. Aside from factories and human wastes, cars contribute about twenty percent of the damage our world is experiencing today. Such vehicle produces smoke that harms our surroundings by destroying the ozone layer which results in global warming. On top of that, the smoke and noise that it produce cause health problems too. The smoke, a byproduct of fuel from cars, that we inhale increases the number of people who acquire lung diseases and the noise from it provokes behavioral changes to humans that are induced by stress. Also, because of the flexibility that cars offer us, more and more people are buying it that causes congestion of roads. Lastly, the most we are concerned about nowadays is the safety issue. We simply cannot ignore this problem since road accidents contributed to the increasing number of casualty each year.
In order to minimize this problem, some people suggest that we should discourage the use of cars, but I think that it would be challenging to do that considering the fact that we cannot avoid to use it. Instead, it would be better to think of alternative ways to alleviate the said problems. To start with, the car manufacturers should start producing environment-friendly cars that can be run using solar energy or electricity so it will not produce smokes. Government plays an important role in addressing the issues as well. For instance, reserving a fund to build new roads and widening it for easier access and less road congestion, they could also implement a strict traffic rule to make sure that people will comply with it, an example would be fining those who misuse their horns, those who over speed and does not follow the signages and stop lights. Another remedy would be for the government to educate not only the drivers but also the pedestrians in obeying road safety.
All in all, though reducing the use of cars may be an immediate solution to the problems I stated, I think setting this goal is not realistic seeing that use of cars is unavoidable for it provides us convenience. Instead, the car manufacturers, the government, and the public should work together to lessen it.
- The table below shows the mothly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001. 73
- The graphs below ashow information about the weekly work hours in Australia in 2001 90
- The table below shows some data regarding Australia s nursing employment and total workforce in 1987 and 2001 87
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?. 73
- The graphs below show the annual expenditure of university students in three countries in 2003 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...ut I think that it would be challenging to do that considering the fact that we canno...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, may, so, well, for instance, i think, to start with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 53.0 24.0651302605 220% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 423.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87234042553 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66209809347 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572104018913 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9424747208 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.473684211 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2631578947 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319839114365 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807193428364 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768540084654 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181553405977 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609773182247 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.