Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?
It is being increasingly awared in our society that government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. While some people think that the government should keep investing to preserve and advocate arts for the benefit of culture, others consider that there are more important fields that we should use our government fund in. As far as I concern, the government should decrease their investment in the field of arts.
People who are against the reduction are primarily focusing on the cultural influences that arts can bring to a country. For example, the United States has the most powerful global influences partly due to its popular culture in the fields of arts, music, films, etc. Invest more money in arts will help boost international influences from their perspective.
While it can benefit national influences by investing more in arts, the government funds are limited. We can make our society better by making wiser government investment strategies. Firstly, there are more vital issues we need to address such as education, medical system, public transportation, etc. Reduce the investment in arts and put the money into other fields can benefit the people even more. In addition, allocate government funds to remote areas of the country can help achieve better social equality. Moreover, artists will be better examined if we let the market to function instead of just giving them subsidies. Therefore, masterpieces can be more expected than before.
While this controversial topic of whether government investment in arts should be reduced is still open to debate, I think the right answer is that we should reduce this investment. With better investment strategies, our society will become better and artists can even find more incentives to create better works.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-07 | Nebi Baltaci | 77 | view |
- The government should create a better network of public transport available for everyone or build more roads owning population 87
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 77
- Is experiential learning (learning by doing) a better approach as compared to formal education. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 72
- National happiness index can be measured by a country s success or economic growth Do you agree or disagree 44
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, i think, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 6.10837438424 278% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71332165209 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540069686411 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8258791129 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.133333333 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323274513981 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128669030231 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147980717509 0.071462118173 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220153056565 0.151781067708 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151197581322 0.0609392437508 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.