With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.
To what extent do you agree?
As the present day is the age of globalization, using the internet and smartphones has become a phenomenon while there is a notion which asserts that widespread use of internet and online communications will replace the direct communications between peoples because of the enormous increase of the population. I completely disagree with this prospect.
First and foremost, advanced communications systems playing a pivotal role in business and economics world, whereas, nowadays, a large majority of companies are working on developing their communication systems especially multinational companies because of its critical need to obtain permanent communications among all sites and centers over the world. For instance, a multinational company which has a plenty of sites distributed over 22 countries could obtain a better management system by using smart communications system even in meetings could be electronic meetings by using smart applications such like Skype, TED, and SAP. This means enormous saving in terms of cost and time.
Furthermore, students along with aspirational hard workers whose living in foreign countries for study/work purposes should be in permanent communications with their families for keeping their productivity high. There are a plethora of benefits in terms of life communications could be definitely a plus point. For instance, a student who joined an international university located in a foreign country could be able to get the guidance and obtain their support. In other words, smartphones and internet communications having the ability to make peoples more close.
Some may argue that online connection made people in total isolation even if they live in the same room each one will be concerned in his/her smart device and the direct interface will obsolete tradition. However, I totally disagree with this prospect because internet connection could give anyone the direct way to communicate with others and develop both of culture and awareness. Consequently, smart communications devices contribute to raising the people awareness in terms of social life.
To conclude, by seeing both sides of the spectrum, it is clearly evident that the internet and text messaging will not make the face to face communication a footnote of the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-16 | Mohamedyousef777 | 95 | view |
| 2018-09-06 | Mohamedyousef777 | 78 | view |
| 2018-02-28 | uzma2011 | 41 | view |
| 2018-02-28 | uzma2011 | 11 | view |
| 2018-02-27 | shivangi patel | 11 | view |
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree? 78
- Discipline is an ever increasing problem in modern schools. Some people think that discipline should be the responsibilities of teachers, while others think this is the role of parents. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some employers want to be able to contact their stuff any time, even on holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 89
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree? 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...y to make peoples more close. Some may argue that online connection made people in t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, whereas, while, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53428571429 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1566205127 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568571428571 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.4386250887 49.4020404114 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9230769231 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240923200611 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871735894609 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752437666059 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157080882481 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788274701041 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.78957915832 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.