Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and give you opinion.
Whereas some people feel that it seems logical to let all students select universities subjects which interest them, others argue that it is better to force such students to major in subjects which may be more beneficial in the future. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will discuss now.
On the one hand, supporters of allowing people to study their favorite fields highlight two main benefits. Firstly, it appears that students may set different goals, which suit their special requirements, ranging from family economic status to learning abilities. This, in fact, can make their enrolling in universities more viable, preventing them from chasing far-fetched aims. Secondly, those who support this idea claim that each person may possess different strengths and weaknesses. If youngsters choose a field which allows them to develop such advantages, they will be more likely to be enhance their academic performance.
On the other hand, proponents of obliging students to focus on certain fields insist that this may provide the society with some benefits. It is notable, for instance, that affluent countries with aging population can lessen the burden on public healthcare by increasing the number of medical practitioners. However, it would appear to be impossible to predict exactly what field will be the most useful. Examples can be seen in Vietnam, where the number of graduates from engineering increased many years ago, as this field had been forecasted to require a large number of employees. In fact, this wrong prediction led such workers suffer chronic unemployment.
In conclusion, although the idea of forcing people to major in certain fields would seem admirable and advantageous in some respects, it would appear that this would put people at higher risks of being jobless due to potential uncertainties. Personally, I would tend to side with the supporters of giving people freedom to study what they prefer.
- All children should learn to speak a foreign language as soon as they start school. ‘How far do you agree with this proposal?’ 73
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this.Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach you own conclusion o 78
- Some people believe that all children should have a pet or an animal to look after Other people disagree however saying that this depends on a child s circumstances Consider these opposing views and give your own opinion 72
- Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. How far do you share this viewpoint? 67
- Some people feel that boarding schools are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 557, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...is field had been forecasted to require a large number of employees. In fact, this wrong predicti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31290322581 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75023601295 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606451612903 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6391028076 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.642857143 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240901002373 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791891899702 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662401827604 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147200293229 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519342497594 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.