Some people believe that it is better to live and work in vertical cities. Others, however, think that horizontal cities are better for living and working.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Infrastructure of living place has been changing rapidly. Industrialisation and modernization often makes the structure of a city to be either horizontal or vertical. It is often argued by some that, living in horizontal places would be better than vertical areas for live and work but, others disagree. However, in my opinion, although, both areas has some pros and cons, horizontal cities would be better than vertical by the flexibility and sustainability of lands.
People who lived in horizontal zone would be more connected to earth and atmosphere in some extent. Thereby, people who support to the horizontal cities makes up the predominant factors of such areas in terms of yard facilities, natural gardens, and relation with the flora and faunas. Inhabitants could enjoy the smell of nature and fascinating amenities of atmosphere from the tip of finger easily. Since, it seems to be more beneficial in mentally and physically. For instance, elderly parents meetings from London emphasize that relaxation and refinement has prone in people living in horizontal places. However, minimal availability of land by the fact of industrialization and shopping centers, horizontal cities are inhibiting more than the last years.
Pop across burgeoning of technology and economy often make people to adjust with vertical cities and this would be common living place recently. There were helpful to accommodate multitude of people in one areas especially in metropolitan cities and urban side. Briefly, this type of cities often give chance to mingle with various categories of people who live in same areas and that may escalate interpersonal relation ship to the core. Nonetheless, such cities would have limited space for privacy and individual purposes and that would lead to conflicts and revolts in certain times. Moreover, this areas tend to have more accidents like fire and short circuits issues, power failure problems in vast.
On balance, both the horizontal and vertical cities are inevitable in modern world with the progression of life. Notwithstanding, in my perspective, horizontal cities had numerous qualities which is close to the human mind for the better living and working rather than vertical cities.
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- It is believed that people who read for pleasure develop their imagination more and acquire better language skills compared to people who prefer watching television To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 84
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age Others think they should begin after 7 years of age Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- In today s world of advanced science and technology many still greatly value artists such as musicians painters and writers What can the arts tell us about life that science cannot 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one area', 'an area', or simply 'areas'?
Suggestion: one area; an area; areas
...l to accommodate multitude of people in one areas especially in metropolitan cities and u...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opolitan cities and urban side. Briefly, this type of cities often give chance to...
^^
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...and revolts in certain times. Moreover, this areas tend to have more accidents like ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, as for, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39828080229 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95272449599 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547277936963 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3083304716 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.823529412 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343317252558 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111065346533 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887656099323 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230863240741 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809869110691 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.