Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Public transport is the main mode of travelling for the middle class people. Government has to allocate more budget for the railways than for roads. This essay will argue why government should grant less money towards roads.
Public transport such as railways should be developed more and the government has to spend an additional amount of money for this. One of the reason that why railways should be allocated with more money is they were the fastest, safest, cheapest mode of transport. It is easy to travel a long distance in trains rather than in any other automobiles. In addition, our country has a great number of working class people who are capable of spending only a small amount of money. Railways are the highest income producing sector for the government. For instance, travelling about 50kms may only charge up to ten rupees which is affordable for all the classes of people and many individuals utilize these leading to an increase in income. Railways can also satisfy upper-class people as they provide AC coaches. For these reasons, the Railway budget should be more than the roads.
Travelling through roads is a bit typical issue considering the safety of the person and vehicle. Most of the automobiles which travel on road are private and should be self-responsible regarding any accidents. Some of the reasons may be roads are less convenient than the railways in order to travel for a long time. In addition, during these days the petrol charges are hiked and in future, it is assumed that a common man cannot use his own vehicle to reach his destination. For example, travelling through roads may consume a lot of time and also expensive. For these reasons, there should be less money spent on roads by the government.
In conclusion, there should be more budget assigned for railways compared to roads. This essay argued on the reasons why more money should be spent on railways other than roads. I completely agree with the given statement as spending more money on railways by the government is beneficial to almost every class of people than roads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- The first bar chart descibes the important reasons for study among students of different age while the second chart illustrates the amount of money they were supported by employers. 73
- The bar chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information. 73
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 73
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket S is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...lf-responsible regarding any accidents. Some of the reasons may be roads are less convenien...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e days the petrol charges are hiked and in future, it is assumed that a common man cannot...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, may, regarding, so, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92067988669 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59166392615 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478753541076 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9007374551 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.85 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269865916719 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101579448174 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954717876802 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209501529074 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110049294179 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.