Medical technology can increase life expectancy Is it a blessing or curse

Essay topics:

Medical technology can increase life expectancy. Is it a blessing or curse?

In recent years, the development of advanced medical technology has sparked a hot debate over the impact of increasing life expectancy. Some people claim that people are living in a healthier life thanks to the advanced medical treatment. Whereas, others believe that long longevity puts an extra burden on the society. In my opinion, despite some drawbacks, the fact that medical technology has improved human’s life shall not be ignored.

Over the past years, governments from different countries have paid attention on bringing healthcare to every citizen, which allows more people to be benefit from the usage of medical technology, including advanced medical treatment in cancer, diabetes and asthma. Through these technologies, people today are living a healthier and longer life. Eventually, population aging becomes a phenomenon that gives young generation more opportunity to spend time with their elders. Thus, medical technology has brought positive impacts to human’s life.

In contrast, population aging stated above also puts economic pressure on young generations and increases the problems associated with generation gap. Government also need to expand age care facilities and policies to enhance the rights of elders, which leads to extra funds from the tax. From this point of view, increasing life expectancy is becoming a burden for the whole society.

In conclusion, there is in deed both positive and negative impact from increasing life expectancy. However, it is almost impossible to neglect its benefits to everyone in the society the drawbacks shall be well handled.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (7 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-29 mohammadsabet 77 view
2022-12-21 Nina Tsarevich 80 view
2022-07-15 Nawal Fatima 72 view
2022-07-15 Nawal Fatima 77 view
2021-11-01 Alireza.r.m 85 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...anks to the advanced medical treatment. Whereas, others believe that long longevity put...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58775510204 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81179760075 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604081632653 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0816991041 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.307692308 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261194740839 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996622299398 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966906197584 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157498936196 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757525131412 0.0609392437508 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.