With increasing number of cars on roads, more and more serious accidents occur with more or less serious consequences. Not only car accidents is the current threat on the roads, however, almost every driver make a driving offence on daily basis. However, retaking driving test should be costly, it also has a number of benefits.
On the one hand, to become a driver is allowed in many developed countries in early teenage age. Take The USA for example. Young people are able to obtain their driver licence after turning 16, furthermore, they do not have any restrictions. From this early age, there is no compulsory reassessment of their driving skills and awareness of the road rules. Undoubtedly, getting driver licence is costly and future assessment, as advised every 6 months, can cause that many drivers will not be able to afford it. As a result of this not only they might not be allow to driver, but will not they be able to work or give a safe drive to their kids to and from school.
However, although I concede that reassessment can be costly, I believe that annual assessment of driving skills and knowledge follows by many advantages. Firstly, it can not be argued that number of car accidents rapidly increased over last decades, despite the fact that majority of cars are now equiped by developed futures to protect driver as well as others, many of motor vehicle accidents are fatal. Therefore, its not only car accident, but also driving offences such as speeding, overtaking where not allowed or lack of self-protection wearing a seat belt. Retaking or reassessing driving skills and road's rules might refresh driver memory. Secondly, with raising number of cars on the roads, experts and authorities continue to develop new road signs, rules or guidelines to make roads safer and avoid congestions. Attendance on this courses should help to the driving members of society to be up-to-date with new rules. For instance, EU recently implemented new rules how to react when arriving to line of cars on highway owning to need to make a designated lane for emergency services. This important update of the road rules have to be shared with public by social media and expensive campaign. Having mandatory reassessment, government might be able to use money spent in this matter differently.
In short, despite the fact of additional cost after obtaining a driver licence and chances of loosing this privilege to many individuals. Therefore, I do believe that reassess driving skills on regular basis outweigh drawbacks.
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries. 56
- Some people think that it is more important to build new houses than to plant trees. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The 11
- Freshwater has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem.What causes of the increased demand, and what measures can governments and individuals take to respond to thi 56
- Some experts beleive that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 839, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...er and avoid congestions. Attendance on this courses should help to the driving memb...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in short, such as, as a result, as well as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 423.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01182033097 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71014387306 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524822695035 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1203667982 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211003740705 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068585677008 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539925697463 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12120773494 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403113112173 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.