Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this.
Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach you own conclusion on which side you favor.
It would seem that these days smoking cigarettes in public places is banned in numerous countries, whereas this regulation has not been enforced fully in other nations. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will discuss now.
On the one hand, supporters of forbidding smoking tobacco publicly claim that there are many vulnerable non-smokers such as women and children in working places or cafes, and these people’s health may suffer significantly if they inhale certain amount of smoke. Such rules, in fact, might reduce the realistic possibility of this situation, thus preventing such non-smokers’ lungs from being damaging. Furthermore, proponents of this idea point to evidence from Bangkok, Thailand where citizens or tourists who smoke in cafes are punished heavily. Such punishments may potentially deter numerous people from smoking, thus protecting the atmosphere at these places.
On the other hand, opponents of banning smoking in public buildings insist that some jobs require a lot of employees’ attention which could be gained by smoking cigarettes. It is notable, for example, that DJs who usually work under high pressure in night clubs tend to smoke in order to keep focused. Moreover, those who oppose regulations against smoking say that it is a widely-observed fact that smoking chambers in public buildings are increasingly common. This might allow people to smoke without having severe effects on others’ health and polluting the air.
In conclusion, I would tend to side with proponents of banning smokers, as it seems logical to put more effort on protecting the general community’s health and lowering the risk of being indirect smokers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | angellica | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | ahmadrava88 | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-18 | nguyenana611 | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-18 | nguyenana611 | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that all children should have a pet or an animal to look after Other people disagree however saying that this depends on a child s circumstances Consider these opposing views and give your own opinion 72
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this.Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach you own conclusion o 78
- Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. How far do you share this viewpoint? 67
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this.Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach you own conclusion o 78
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of aging populations. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, thus, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48106060606 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98647999942 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651515151515 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8779125306 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.545454545 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203937125782 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768471783861 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423720373105 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109670915491 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586441121851 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.