Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of medical technology and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that preparing students for universities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, human's life expectancy can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, taking responsibility for life might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of hospital patients could relate to this reality that the demerits of effective medication pertain to high technology. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of medical treatment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon pertain to total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
- Does video communication with doctors help patients to cure any disease? 88
- Essay topics:It has recently been suggested that the classical, or "dead", languages Latin and Greek should be re-introduced into the school curriculum. Those that oppose the idea claim that the ancient languages are of no practical use and no help in get 88
- People usually mix their private and professional life. What are the pros and cons of this? 88
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82625482625 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25401777104 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69111969112 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0927231313 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105224383115 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346614961334 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385955669223 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0581815660144 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016294087657 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.51 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.