Nowadays, with the development in social technology, many scientists are in doubt that whether the process of children’s education is in a better situation than past or not. Object opinions believe that students cannot focus on their tasks, for cell phones, online games, and social networking websites occupy most of their time. Although I totally agree with their viewpoint, I believe that children’s educational system has improved incrementally, which consequently, create a convenient condition for studying.
Firstly, with increasing the accessibility of smart cell phones, most of the children own ones. Excessive usage distracts students’ attention in the classes. In somehow, they addicted to their mobile phones, which they cannot even separate from it in classrooms. Therefore, teachers have to manage and control them. Since in most situation, the number of students in each class is more than ten, teachers cannot handle all of them.
Moreover, today, so many amazing online games and social applications have developed. Most of them are designed by several expert computer engineers and psychologists who know how to attract children. Hence, youth prefer to play games with each other rather than focusing on their lessons and projects. Furthermore, children are in their “curious period” of their life which means that they are more curious about any situation, which leads them to join on several social networking applications such as Instagram and Facebook to know about famous people’s lifestyle or even some of their acquaintances. An example of this is my sister, Mahsa. She was one of the best students in the class when she was in the first year of high school. However, she did not gain this achievement in the second year, for she joined to a group of online games, which not only does occupies most of her precious time but also disturb her attention in classes.
Admittedly, with educational system development, students can easily search on a specific subject. They can increase their knowledge by searching on the websites or googling the issue, which makes learning conditions easier. Moreover, with cell phones, students can communicate with teachers in the case of facing an educational problem. And also, parents can easily contact their child’s teachers to be aware of their child’s manner. In this situation, if the student does not acquire standard scores, parents will understand as soon as possible.
In conclusion, although most of the educational consultants have many problems on controlling children’s educational behavior and limiting their spending time on cell phones, online games, and social networking website, the educational system provides a better condition for students to do their tasks.
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 73
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world." Use reasons and details to support your opinion. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well 78
- Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship, because being away from people reminds us of how important they are. Others think we should always stay with others to have good relationship because we can communicate wi 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts will understand as soon as possible. In conclusion, although most of the educ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, even so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2371.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51395348837 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01051070236 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527906976744 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.5600852011 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.904761905 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4761904762 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185363784733 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05573131473 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485935197013 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120449552889 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532518609069 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.