Nowadays people are living in a "thrown-away" society where they use things for a short time and then throw away. What cause this and what problem it may lead to?
A "thrown-away" lifestyle is increasingly gaining the popularity. It is a lifestyle that people give up on products very quickly and do not attempt to keep things longer. This essay wil discuss the possible causes of this particular social phenomenan and demonstrate the potential problems it might lead to.
In terms of possible causes, a high speed of technology development could play a crucial role. New and advanced products are manufactured and updated every minute which attract people to purchase and throw old ones away. For example, new Iphone is introduced to the public every six months with new functions and more charming looking. Thus, attention will be drawn to new Iphone from old ones. The improvement of technology is causing a fast-spped lifestyle.
Moreover, a reasonable low price for most of items might be a reason for the "thrown-away" lifestyle as well. It does not have a significant cost to replace a out fashion product with a new one. For instance, more and more clothes stores such as H&M open around the world with considerable low price clothing compared to local traditional shops, encouraging people to purchase new arrivals and get rid of others.
However, this new lifestyle might lead to several potential issues that should not be ignored. Firstly, quickly throwing away products that are only used for a short time would cause a increase number of rubbish. Secondly, people are more likely to spend unnecessary money on new items even though they could simply fix broken ones or keep using old ones.
All in all, people find it easier to buy new things and put old things in the rubbish bins nowadays. This essay discussed two causes and two possible negative outcomes of this lifestyle.
- the natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What problem does it cause? How can we slove these problems? 84
- Students in school or university learn more from classes of teachers than other resources (eg. internet or TV), do you agree or disagree? 84
- Today many young people change their jobs or careers every few years What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 91
- Many people prefer to communicate with their online friends than to socialize with people in their local communities Do you think it has more advantages than disadvantages 78
- Nowadays people are living in a "thrown-away" society where they use things for a short time and then throw away. What cause this and what problem it may lead to? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
A 'thrown-away' lifestyle is in...
^
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (wil) must be used with a third-person verb: 'discusses'.
Suggestion: discusses
...t to keep things longer. This essay wil discuss the possible causes of this particular ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the items') or simply say ''most items''.
Suggestion: most of the items; most items
... Moreover, a reasonable low price for most of items might be a reason for the 'thrown-...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... not have a significant cost to replace a out fashion product with a new one. For...
^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... only used for a short time would cause a increase number of rubbish. Secondly, p...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11805555556 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03057974326 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586805555556 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6145462897 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.125 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263301966959 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842864650239 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800778632783 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150868454522 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649201432824 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.